Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians pay range in Visalia
New workers and the lowest-paid 10% earn about $49,520 a year or less, while the top 10% make $105,290 or more. The middle half of cardiovascular technologists and technicians in Visalia earn between $49,850 and $97,170.
- $50K10th
- $50K25th
- $52KMedian
- $97K75th
- $105K90th
median average · bar = middle 50% of workers
| Pay level | Per year | Per month | Per hour* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average | $67,030 | $5,586 | $32.23 |
| Median | $51,980 | $4,332 | $24.99 |
| Entry level (25th percentile) | $49,850 | $4,154 | $23.97 |
| Experienced (75th percentile) | $97,170 | $8,098 | $46.72 |
*Hourly figures assume 2,080 paid hours a year.
Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salary after taxes in Visalia
On the average salary of $67,030, a single filer in Visalia takes home about $53,696 a year, or $4,475 a month and $2,065 every two weeks. Taxes take 20% of gross pay.
Single filer, standard deduction: federal income tax (2026 brackets), Social Security, Medicare and state income tax (2025 rules). California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
Is Visalia a good place for cardiovascular technologists and technicians? Pay vs. cost of living
Prices in the Visalia area are in line with the U.S. average (BEA price parity 99.8), so the average $67,030 buys what about $67,148 would buy in a typical U.S. metro. This job pays 1.2 times the median wage of all jobs in Visalia ($45,130). A typical home costs $363,064, or 5.4 years of this average salary before tax.
Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salary in other California cities
Visalia ranks 15th of 15 California metro areas for this job; San Jose pays the most ($134,110).
- San Jose$134,110
- San Francisco$118,360
- Modesto$116,700
- Oxnard$112,050
- Bakersfield$103,830
- Sacramento$103,830
- Vallejo$103,530
- Santa Rosa$102,700
- San Diego$88,940
- Visalia$67,030
All Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salaries in California
Highest-paying cities for cardiovascular technologists and technicians
Salt Lake City, UT pays this job the most of the metro areas we cover ($167,160).
- Salt Lake City, UT$167,160
- San Jose, CA$134,110
- San Francisco, CA$118,360
- Modesto, CA$116,700
- Oxnard, CA$112,050
Does this match what you are paid?
Anonymous, no account. Results update as visitors answer.
Share your pay anonymously
Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salary in Visalia: questions
How much do cardiovascular technologists and technicians make an hour in Visalia?
$32.23 an hour on average, and $24.99 at the median (BLS, May 2025).
What is the entry-level cardiovascular technologists and technicians salary in Visalia?
The lowest-paid 10% earn about $49,520 a year and the 25th percentile is $49,850, a fair guide to starting pay.
What is the cardiovascular technologists and technicians take-home pay in Visalia?
About $53,696 a year ($4,475 a month) for a single filer on the average salary of $67,030. California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
Do cardiovascular technologists and technicians earn more in Visalia than elsewhere?
The average here is 14% less than the U.S. metro average for this job ($78,034).
Sources and how to read this page
- Wages: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), May 2025 estimates for metropolitan areas. SOC code 29-2031; area Visalia, CA (47300). Relative standard error of the mean wage: 1.0%.
- Cost of living: Bureau of Economic Analysis regional price parities (RPP), 2024; 100 = U.S. average.
- Home value: Zillow Home Value Index. Typical-wage figure: OEWS all occupations, same metro.
- Take-home pay: Single filer, standard deduction: federal income tax (2026 brackets), Social Security, Medicare and state income tax (2025 rules). California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
- Job concentration: location quotient 0.47, this job is less common than in the U.S. overall (location quotient 0.47).
Read the full methodology. Spotted an error? Tell us.