Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians pay range in Santa Rosa
New workers and the lowest-paid 10% earn about $55,950 a year or less, while the top 10% make $163,700 or more. The middle half of cardiovascular technologists and technicians in Santa Rosa earn between $78,130 and $126,950.
- $56K10th
- $78K25th
- $92KMedian
- $127K75th
- $164K90th
median average · bar = middle 50% of workers
| Pay level | Per year | Per month | Per hour* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average | $102,700 | $8,558 | $49.38 |
| Median | $92,110 | $7,676 | $44.28 |
| Entry level (25th percentile) | $78,130 | $6,511 | $37.56 |
| Experienced (75th percentile) | $126,950 | $10,579 | $61.03 |
*Hourly figures assume 2,080 paid hours a year.
Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salary after taxes in Santa Rosa
On the average salary of $102,700, a single filer in Santa Rosa takes home about $75,620 a year, or $6,302 a month and $2,908 every two weeks. Taxes take 26% of gross pay.
Single filer, standard deduction: federal income tax (2026 brackets), Social Security, Medicare and state income tax (2025 rules). California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
Is Santa Rosa a good place for cardiovascular technologists and technicians? Pay vs. cost of living
Prices in the Santa Rosa area are 8% above the U.S. average (BEA price parity 107.8), so the average $102,700 buys what about $95,283 would buy in a typical U.S. metro. This job pays 1.6 times the median wage of all jobs in Santa Rosa ($56,850). A typical home costs $796,761, or 7.8 years of this average salary before tax.
Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salary in other California cities
Santa Rosa ranks 8th of 15 California metro areas for this job; San Jose pays the most ($134,110).
- San Jose$134,110
- San Francisco$118,360
- Modesto$116,700
- Oxnard$112,050
- Bakersfield$103,830
- Sacramento$103,830
- Vallejo$103,530
- Santa Rosa$102,700
- San Diego$88,940
- Stockton$86,010
All Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salaries in California
Highest-paying cities for cardiovascular technologists and technicians
Salt Lake City, UT pays this job the most of the metro areas we cover ($167,160).
- Salt Lake City, UT$167,160
- San Jose, CA$134,110
- San Francisco, CA$118,360
- Modesto, CA$116,700
- Oxnard, CA$112,050
Does this match what you are paid?
Anonymous, no account. Results update as visitors answer.
Share your pay anonymously
Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians salary in Santa Rosa: questions
How much do cardiovascular technologists and technicians make an hour in Santa Rosa?
$49.38 an hour on average, and $44.28 at the median (BLS, May 2025).
What is the entry-level cardiovascular technologists and technicians salary in Santa Rosa?
The lowest-paid 10% earn about $55,950 a year and the 25th percentile is $78,130, a fair guide to starting pay.
What is the cardiovascular technologists and technicians take-home pay in Santa Rosa?
About $75,620 a year ($6,302 a month) for a single filer on the average salary of $102,700. California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
Do cardiovascular technologists and technicians earn more in Santa Rosa than elsewhere?
The average here is 32% more than the U.S. metro average for this job ($78,034).
Sources and how to read this page
- Wages: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), May 2025 estimates for metropolitan areas. SOC code 29-2031; area Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA (42220). Relative standard error of the mean wage: 2.5%.
- Cost of living: Bureau of Economic Analysis regional price parities (RPP), 2024; 100 = U.S. average.
- Home value: Zillow Home Value Index. Typical-wage figure: OEWS all occupations, same metro.
- Take-home pay: Single filer, standard deduction: federal income tax (2026 brackets), Social Security, Medicare and state income tax (2025 rules). California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
- Job concentration: location quotient 0.48, this job is less common than in the U.S. overall (location quotient 0.48).
Read the full methodology. Spotted an error? Tell us.