Radiologic Technologists and Technicians pay range in San Jose
New workers and the lowest-paid 10% earn about $98,910 a year or less, while the top 10% make $185,340 or more. The middle half of radiologic technologists and technicians in San Jose earn between $126,590 and $176,280.
- $99K10th
- $127K25th
- $155KMedian
- $176K75th
- $185K90th
median average · bar = middle 50% of workers
| Pay level | Per year | Per month | Per hour* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average | $151,170 | $12,598 | $72.68 |
| Median | $154,850 | $12,904 | $74.45 |
| Entry level (25th percentile) | $126,590 | $10,549 | $60.86 |
| Experienced (75th percentile) | $176,280 | $14,690 | $84.75 |
*Hourly figures assume 2,080 paid hours a year.
Radiologic Technologists and Technicians salary after taxes in San Jose
On the average salary of $151,170, a single filer in San Jose takes home about $104,624 a year, or $8,719 a month and $4,024 every two weeks. Taxes take 31% of gross pay.
Single filer, standard deduction: federal income tax (2026 brackets), Social Security, Medicare and state income tax (2025 rules). California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
Is San Jose a good place for radiologic technologists and technicians? Pay vs. cost of living
Prices in the San Jose area are 10% above the U.S. average (BEA price parity 110.4), so the average $151,170 buys what about $136,901 would buy in a typical U.S. metro. This job pays 1.8 times the median wage of all jobs in San Jose ($84,050). A typical home costs $1,610,466, or 10.7 years of this average salary before tax.
Radiologic Technologists and Technicians salary in other California cities
San Jose ranks 1st of 24 California metro areas for this job, the best-paid in the state.
- San Jose$151,170
- Vallejo$150,010
- San Francisco$138,390
- Santa Rosa$137,780
- Sacramento$127,380
- Modesto$127,310
- Stockton$121,340
- Redding$118,800
- Santa Cruz$117,390
- Santa Maria$112,990
All Radiologic Technologists and Technicians salaries in California
Highest-paying cities for radiologic technologists and technicians
San Jose, CA pays this job the most of the metro areas we cover ($151,170).
- San Jose, CA$151,170
- Vallejo, CA$150,010
- San Francisco, CA$138,390
- Santa Rosa, CA$137,780
- Sacramento, CA$127,380
Does this match what you are paid?
Anonymous, no account. Results update as visitors answer.
Share your pay anonymously
Radiologic Technologists and Technicians salary in San Jose: questions
How much do radiologic technologists and technicians make an hour in San Jose?
$72.68 an hour on average, and $74.45 at the median (BLS, May 2025).
What is the entry-level radiologic technologists and technicians salary in San Jose?
The lowest-paid 10% earn about $98,910 a year and the 25th percentile is $126,590, a fair guide to starting pay.
What is the radiologic technologists and technicians take-home pay in San Jose?
About $104,624 a year ($8,719 a month) for a single filer on the average salary of $151,170. California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
Do radiologic technologists and technicians earn more in San Jose than elsewhere?
The average here is 78% more than the U.S. metro average for this job ($85,085).
Sources and how to read this page
- Wages: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), May 2025 estimates for metropolitan areas. SOC code 29-2034; area San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA (41940). Relative standard error of the mean wage: 0.9%.
- Cost of living: Bureau of Economic Analysis regional price parities (RPP), 2024; 100 = U.S. average.
- Home value: Zillow Home Value Index. Typical-wage figure: OEWS all occupations, same metro.
- Take-home pay: Single filer, standard deduction: federal income tax (2026 brackets), Social Security, Medicare and state income tax (2025 rules). California State Disability Insurance (1.3% of wages, paid by employees) is not included.
- Job concentration: location quotient 0.59, this job is less common than in the U.S. overall (location quotient 0.59).
Read the full methodology. Spotted an error? Tell us.